Friday, October 27, 2006

Question #1 (a-c)

The ELARC Vendor Advisory Committee (VAC) used its meeting yesterday, October 25, to discuss the purpose, vision and format of the VAC. This process can be expected to continue over several months. Several themes, emerged, listed below. Please review the list below and leave your ideas in the comments below to any of these questions:
1a. Which of the items on the list are of the greatest value?

1b. Do you have any suggestions for rephrasing any of these?

1c. Is there anything you would like to add?


For those of you who are knew to this site, brief explanations can be through in the two links on the right under the heading New Here?

For those of you who are new to the concept of the blog, you can add your opinion, either anonymously or under your own name, by clicking on the word "comments" at the bottom of this post. It is appropriate in the comments not only to leave a new opinion but to respond to other opinions there as well.

If you have any further questions, please call Alana at home any old day and time, even in the wee hours. Don't worry about it, she hardly needs rest. Or you can email me at the address shown when you click on my name.

Now the list:
The following are proposed to be the most valuable functions for the VAC:

-To communicate directly with the general community, the local disability community, the ELARC staff and board, DDS and one another.

-To improve the quality of life of people with disabilities.

-To increase vendor participation and have it be more representative.

-A closed session of the VAC without ELARC staff present to start each meeting.

-New categories of committees, particularly tailored to facilitate transition and cooperation between vendor agencies.

-Complete feedback loop between VAC and board, collaborative.

-Representation of legislative and political action.

-Serving as a change agent.

-Providing training.

-Include comprehensive and systems thinking about the system as a whole.


What do you all think? Which of the above resonate and which are less or more important? My instinct is we need no more than 5 items on this list to take a next step.

Question #2

Hi, everybody. This post is following up on the Vendor Advisory Committee meeting from yesterday. A summary is above in the post accompanying question #1. The question here is, what parts of the existing VAC meeting should be condensed, moved to a subcommittee or eliminated?

Remember you can answer anonymously if you choose to.

Thursday, October 26, 2006

More photos of VAC notes...





VAC Notes - Vision Statement

Here are the photos of the notes taken at the VAC which adressed what we would like our Vision to be: